Select processor 1
Select processor 2
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2017
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
Released
Q4/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800

What's the best choice EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING or Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING has a maximum frequency of 1.480 GHz. Memory size 11 GB. Memory type GDDR5X. Released in Q1/2017.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 has a maximum frequency of 1.800 GHz+ 6 %. Memory size 16 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1074 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1154 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1097 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1397 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    849 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    1097 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1054 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    1311 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    606 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    575 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 18% better clock speed

    1.800 GHz+ 6 % left arrow 1.480 GHz
  • More memory

    31% more memory

    16 GB left arrow 11 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    648 place
  • Battlefield 5
    387 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    463 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    641 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    850 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    714 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    400 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    459 place

Specifications

Technical data
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6800
  • GPU Chip
    GP102-350-K1-A1 left arrow Navi 21
  • Execution units
    28 left arrow 60
  • Shader
    3584 left arrow 3840
  • Render Output Units
    88 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    224 left arrow 240
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    11 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5X left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    1.376 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    484 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    352 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.480 GHz left arrow 1.800 GHz+ 6 %
  • Boost Clock
    1.582 GHz left arrow 2.170 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.950 GHz+ 7 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    250 W left arrow 250 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 285 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800.

  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 3 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 37 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    269 mm left arrow 303 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 127 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 54 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 and EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q1/2017 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 679 $
  • Structure size
    16 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    11G-P4-5390-KR left arrow 11305-02-20G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
11.34
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
16.67
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark is designed for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their hardware
9889
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
15170
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
64 fps (avg)
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
91 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
39 fps (avg)
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
64 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
50 MH/s
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
58 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
98 MH/s
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
111 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
25 MH/s
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
28 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
VertCoin cryptocurrency can be mined on both Nvidia and AMD and is interesting because it mines perfectly on old GPUs like GTX1050, R9 290 and even GTX970
0.78 MH/s
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
0.85 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800
-->

Latest comparisons