Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Core i9-13900K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Core i9-13900K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-13900K

What's the best choice Intel Xeon W-3275M or Intel Core i9-13900K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon W-3275M has a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. 28 Cores. Power consumption of 205 W. Released in Q2/2019.

Intel Core i9-13900K has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    35 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    4 times more cores

    28 left arrow 24

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    261 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    34 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    23 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    70 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    72 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    12 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 34% better clock speed

    3.80 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.61 times less performance per watt

    125 W left arrow 205 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    12 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    13 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    10 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    9 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    18 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    32 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    355 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    20 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Blender 3.1 Benchmark
    5 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Core i9-13900K Intel Core i9-13900K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W left arrow Intel Core i9
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 13
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow Intel Core i 13000
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Intel Core i9-12900K
  • Successor
    -- left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    28 left arrow 24
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.60 GHz left arrow No
  • CPU Threads
    56 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid
  • A core
    -- left arrow 8x Raptor Cove / 3.80 GHz (5.70 GHz)
  • B core
    -- left arrow 16x Gracemont / 3.00 GHz (4.20 GHz)
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.45 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 32
  • Shader
    left arrow 256
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 16 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 4
  • Generation
    left arrow 12
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 10 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2022
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-13900K and Intel Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR5-5600
  • Max. Memory
    2048 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    6 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon W-3275M and Intel Core i9-13900K to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W left arrow 125 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow No
  • TDP (PL2)
    -- left arrow 241 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow No
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M and Intel Xeon W-3275M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 32.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    38.50 MB left arrow 36.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Raptor Lake S
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647 left arrow LGA 1700
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q4/2022

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon W-3275M and Intel Core i9-13900K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 SC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
1107
Intel Xeon W-3275M
2267
Intel Core i9-13900K
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 MC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows using a multi-core and hyperthreading
28051
Intel Xeon W-3275M
38460
Intel Core i9-13900K
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
437
Intel Xeon W-3275M
888
Intel Core i9-13900K
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
11020
Intel Xeon W-3275M
14820
Intel Core i9-13900K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1096
Intel Xeon W-3275M
2147
Intel Core i9-13900K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
17196
Intel Xeon W-3275M
23982
Intel Core i9-13900K

Latest comparisons