Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon D-1747NTE vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
Released
Q1/2018
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

What's the best choice Intel Xeon D-1747NTE or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Xeon D-1747NTE has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 10 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 80 W. Released in Q1/2022.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2018.

Differences

  • More number of cores

    6 more cores

    10 left arrow 4
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    220 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 44% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 11 % higher specified turbo frequency

    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    65 W left arrow 80 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    251 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    238 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    295 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    262 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    361 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    351 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    571 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    560 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    134 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    85 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    223 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    233 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    196 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    3 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    414 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon D-1700 left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000G
  • Family
    Intel Xeon D left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 1
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.5 GHz left arrow 3.6 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Core Configuration
    10x Sunny Cove left arrow -
  • CPU Cores
    10 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    20 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.5 GHz left arrow 3.9 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)
    2.8 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 3.7 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 11
  • Generation
    - left arrow 8
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 1250 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 2 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q1/2018
  • Shader
    - left arrow 704
  • Technology
    - left arrow 14 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Xeon D-1747NTE. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    384 GB left arrow 64 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    70 GB/s left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    3 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • PCIe
    4.0 x 16 left arrow -
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 12
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 3.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon D-1747NTE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    - left arrow 95 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    80 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP down
    - left arrow 46 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1747NTE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Ice Lake left arrow Raven Ridge (Zen)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    15 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    - left arrow 4 MB
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10, Linux left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2018
  • Socket
    BGA 2227 left arrow AM4
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

Latest comparisons