What's the best choice Intel Xeon D-1747NTE or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 10 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 80 W. Released in Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2018.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
6 more cores
Common positions Intel Xeon D-1747NTE CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Higher clock speed
Around 44% better clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 11 % higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Xeon D-1747NTE
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Xeon D-1747NTE. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon D-1747NTE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1747NTE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.