Intel Core i5-8350U
Intel Celeron N5095
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i5-8350U vs Intel Celeron N5095. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Intel Core i5-8350U
Intel Core i5-8350U
Released
Q1/2021
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N5095
Intel Celeron N5095

What's the best choice Intel Core i5-8350U or Intel Celeron N5095? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core i5-8350U has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q3/2017.

Intel Celeron N5095 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q1/2021.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    224 left arrow place
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 24% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-8350U CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    289 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    277 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    307 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    265 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    509 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    452 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    469 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    743 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    112 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    308 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    153 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    313 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    41 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    526 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 18% better clock speed

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i5-8350U Intel Core i5-8350U
Intel Celeron N5095 Intel Celeron N5095
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 8000U left arrow Intel Celeron N5000
  • Family
    Intel Core i5 left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 10
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.7 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.6 GHz left arrow 2.9 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    2.4 GHz left arrow 2.5 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow 16
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow 11
  • GPU Frequency
    300 MHz left arrow 450 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 620 left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Elkhart Lake)
  • GPU Turbo
    1100 MHz left arrow 750 MHz
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q1/2021
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 128
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N5095 and Intel Core i5-8350U. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    32 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR4-2933LPDDR4-2933
  • PCIe lanes
    12 left arrow 8
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i5-8350U and Intel Celeron N5095 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    15 W left arrow 15 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-8350U and Intel Celeron N5095, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Kaby Lake U Refresh left arrow Jasper Lake
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 1.5 MB
  • L3-Cache
    6 MB left arrow 4 MB
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q1/2021
  • Socket
    BGA 1356 left arrow BGA 1090
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.19.3 / 1M / 2 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Celeron N5095 519.725938 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.19.3 / 1M / 2 threads / windows
System RAM: 8 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Duration: 1924.091 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Latest comparisons