Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Celeron N3160
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i5-3210M vs Intel Celeron N3160. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2012
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Core i5-3210M
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3160

What's the best choice Intel Core i5-3210M or Intel Celeron N3160? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Core i5-3210M has a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 35 W. Released in Q2/2012.

Intel Celeron N3160 has a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1312 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 36% better clock speed

    2.50 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 28% better overclocked clock speed

    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-3210M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    509 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    479 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1070 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1226 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1190 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    544 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    592 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    246 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    659 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1145 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1483 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.17 times less performance per watt

    6 W left arrow 35 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1043 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    998 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1417 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1434 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1480 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    775 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    804 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    738 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    307 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1224 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    290 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    300 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i5-3210M Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Celeron N3160
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Core i5 left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 3000M left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 4000 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.65 GHz left arrow 0.32 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.10 GHz left arrow 0.64 GHz
  • Execution units
    16 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11.0 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Core i5-3210M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • Max. Memory
    32 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 4
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i5-3210M and Intel Celeron N3160 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 6 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-3210M and Intel Core i5-3210M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge H left arrow Braswell
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1023 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Core i5-3210M and Intel Celeron N3160.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
558
Intel Core i5-3210M
210
Intel Celeron N3160
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1236
Intel Core i5-3210M
709
Intel Celeron N3160
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
282
Intel Core i5-3210M
134
Intel Celeron N3160
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2487
Intel Core i5-3210M
943
Intel Celeron N3160
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
5289
Intel Core i5-3210M
3161
Intel Celeron N3160
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.2
Intel Core i5-3210M
0.44
Intel Celeron N3160
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
2.9
Intel Core i5-3210M
1.67
Intel Celeron N3160
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
3789
Intel Core i5-3210M
1950
Intel Celeron N3160

Latest comparisons