Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N2808
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N2808. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2014
Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N2840
Released
Q2/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Celeron N2808

What's the best choice Intel Celeron N2840 or Intel Celeron N2808? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron N2840 has a maximum frequency of 2.16 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 7.5 W. Released in Q2/2014.

Intel Celeron N2808 has a maximum frequency of 1.58 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 4.3 W. Released in Q2/2014.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1597 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 27% better clock speed

    2.16 GHz left arrow 1.58 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 13% better overclocked clock speed

    2.58 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2840 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1028 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1038 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1668 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    834 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    874 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    795 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    815 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    375 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1388 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1503 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.57 times less performance per watt

    4.3 W left arrow 7.5 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2808 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1052 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1045 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1674 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    871 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    887 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    796 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    824 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    359 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1345 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    288 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 6
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.16 GHz left arrow 1.58 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.58 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.58 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.31 GHz left arrow 0.31 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.79 GHz left arrow 0.79 GHz
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N2808 and Intel Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow 4
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Celeron N2808 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    7.5 W left arrow 4.3 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Celeron N2840, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q2/2014 left arrow Q2/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Celeron N2808.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
42
Intel Celeron N2840
36
Intel Celeron N2808
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
81
Intel Celeron N2840
70
Intel Celeron N2808
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
51
Intel Celeron N2840
51
Intel Celeron N2808
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
966
Intel Celeron N2840
802
Intel Celeron N2808
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1702
Intel Celeron N2840
1394
Intel Celeron N2808
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.41
Intel Celeron N2840
0.43
Intel Celeron N2808
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
0.86
Intel Celeron N2840
0.79
Intel Celeron N2808
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
5.7
Intel Celeron N2840
9.6
Intel Celeron N2808
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1239
Intel Celeron N2840
990
Intel Celeron N2808

Latest comparisons