Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Processor N200
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Processor N200. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron J1900
Released
Q1/2023
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Processor N200
Intel Processor N200

What's the best choice Intel Celeron J1900 or Intel Processor N200? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron J1900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 10 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Intel Processor N200 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Released in Q1/2023.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J1900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    547 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    476 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1009 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    961 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1225 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1181 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1595 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    835 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    766 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    756 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    715 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    367 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1078 place
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 53 % higher specified turbo frequency

    3.70 GHz left arrow 2.42 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    6 W left arrow 10 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Processor N200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    454 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    746 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1237 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    656 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    62 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    62 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Processor N200 Intel Processor N200
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow Intel Processor N50/N100/N200
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Processor N
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 13
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2 GHz left arrow 1.8 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.42 GHz left arrow 3.7 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    2.42 GHz left arrow 3.4 GHz
  • Core Configuration
    - left arrow 4x Gracemont
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 32
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 12
  • GPU Frequency
    690 MHz left arrow 750 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
  • GPU Turbo
    850 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q1/2023
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 256
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 10 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Processor N200 and Intel Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1 (Single Channel)
  • Memory type
    - left arrow DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR5-4800
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow -
  • Memory Bandwidth
    - left arrow 38.4 GB/s
  • PCIe
    - left arrow 3.0 x 9
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Processor N200 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    - left arrow 105 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    10 W left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    - left arrow 6 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Processor N200, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Alder Lake N
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 4 MB
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 6 MB
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q1/2023
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Chip design
    - left arrow Monolithic
  • Documents
    - left arrow Technical data sheet
  • Operating systems
    - left arrow Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
  • Release price
    - left arrow 193 $

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Processor N200.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

214.000000
Intel Celeron J1900
958.000000
Intel Processor N200
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

703.000000
Intel Celeron J1900
2128.000000
Intel Processor N200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

55.000000
Intel Celeron J1900
216.000000
Intel Processor N200
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

1759.000000
Intel Celeron J1900
5227.000000
Intel Processor N200

Latest comparisons