Intel Celeron G3920
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G3920 vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron G3920
Intel Celeron G3920
Released
Q3/2014
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

What's the best choice Intel Celeron G3920 or Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron G3920 has a base frequency of 2.90 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 51 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 135 W. Released in Q3/2014.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 26% better clock speed

    2.90 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    51 W left arrow 135 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G3920 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    667 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    849 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1324 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    480 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    610 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    430 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    583 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    234 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    857 place
  • More number of cores

    14 more cores

    16 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    507 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    80 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    247 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    43 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    233 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    53 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    136 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron G3920 Intel Celeron G3920
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron G3000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v3
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Xeon E5
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 5
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Successor
    - left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.9 GHz left arrow 2.3 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 16
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 3.6 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)
    - left arrow 3 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12.0 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow -
  • Generation
    9 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    350 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 510 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU Turbo
    950 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow -
  • Max. GPU Memory
    32 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow -
  • Shader
    96 left arrow -
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow -
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Intel Celeron G3920. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 40
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron G3920 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    51 W left arrow 135 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G3920 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Skylake S left arrow Haswell E
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 40.00 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q3/2014
  • Socket
    LGA 1151 left arrow LGA 2011-3
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron G3920 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

123.000000
Intel Celeron G3920
139.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

220.000000
Intel Celeron G3920
2544.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

2857.000000
Intel Celeron G3920
3740.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

5049.000000
Intel Celeron G3920
54216.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.400000
Intel Celeron G3920
1.730000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

2.730000
Intel Celeron G3920
25.980000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

3350.000000
Intel Celeron G3920
21042.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

Latest comparisons