AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2025-07-28
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Released
2026-06-02
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a base frequency of 2 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. Released in 2025-07-28.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205 has a base frequency of 2.8 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. Released in 2026-06-02.

Differences

  • More number of cores

    8 more cores

    12 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 11% higher specified turbo frequency

    5.1 GHz left arrow 4.6 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 40% better clock speed

    2.8 GHz left arrow 2 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen left arrow Ryzen PRO
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI 300 Series left arrow Ryzen PRO 200 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2 GHz left arrow 2.8 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 8
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz left arrow 4.6 GHz
  • Overclocking
    - left arrow No
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz left arrow 2300 MHz
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon 890M left arrow AMD Radeon 740M
  • Graphics Cores
    16 left arrow 4
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP8) left arrow DDR5 (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP8)
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    15-54 W left arrow 15-40 W
  • Default TDP
    28 W left arrow 28 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 205, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Strix Point left arrow Hawk Point
  • L2-Cache
    12 MB left arrow 4 MB
  • L3-Cache
    24 MB left arrow 8 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-370.html left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen-pro/200-series/amd-ryzen-3-pro-205.html
  • Release date
    2025-07-28 left arrow 2026-06-02
  • Socket
    FP8 left arrow FP8
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons