AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2025-12-04
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G
Released
2024-04-01
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G or AMD Ryzen 5 8400F? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2025-12-04.

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2024-04-01.

Differences

  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    8 left arrow 6
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 9% higher specified turbo frequency

    5.1 GHz left arrow 4.7 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 8400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen PRO left arrow Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Desktops left arrow Desktops
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Series
    Ryzen PRO 8000 Series left arrow Ryzen 8000 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    4.2 GHz left arrow 4.2 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 6
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 12
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz left arrow 4.7 GHz
  • Overclocking
    - left arrow Yes
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon 780M left arrow None
  • Graphics Cores
    12 left arrow -
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 left arrow DDR5
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    45-65 W left arrow 45-65 W
  • Default TDP
    65 W left arrow 65 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    95 °C left arrow 95 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8705G and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Phoenix left arrow Phoenix
  • L2-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 6 MB
  • L3-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 16 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen-pro/8000-series/amd-ryzen-7-pro-8705g.html left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/8000-series/amd-ryzen-5-8400f.html
  • Release date
    2025-12-04 left arrow 2024-04-01
  • Socket
    AM5 left arrow AM5
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons