AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Intel Xeon Gold 6328H
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Xeon Gold 6328H. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2018
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Released
Q2/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Xeon Gold 6328H
Intel Xeon Gold 6328H

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or Intel Xeon Gold 6328H? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2018.

Intel Xeon Gold 6328H has a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 165 W. Released in Q2/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    575 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 22% better clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 165 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    296 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    269 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    332 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    288 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    394 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    363 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    699 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    744 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    150 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    86 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    230 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    168 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    182 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    4 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    569 place
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    16 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 9 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.30 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon Gold 6328H CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Intel Xeon Gold 6328H Intel Xeon Gold 6328H
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 2000G left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5300/6300
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.90 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    1.25 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    11 left arrow
  • Shader
    704 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    8 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon Gold 6328H and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow 1152 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    12 left arrow 48
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Xeon Gold 6328H to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 165 W
  • TDP down
    46 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 22.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Raven Ridge (Zen) left arrow Cooper Lake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    AM4 left arrow LGA 4189
  • Release date
    Q1/2018 left arrow Q2/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Xeon Gold 6328H.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons