AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
—
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
Released
—
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS or AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W.

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has a base frequency of 3 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    3.2 GHz left arrow 3 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    45 W left arrow 55 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • More number of cores

    8 more cores

    12 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 24 % higher specified turbo frequency

    5.2 GHz left arrow 4.2 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen left arrow Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen 7000 Series left arrow Ryzen 9000 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.2 GHz left arrow 3 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 12
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 24
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.2 GHz left arrow 5.2 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    None left arrow AMD Radeon 610M
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 2200 MHz
  • Graphics Cores
    - left arrow 2
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 left arrow DDR5
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 5.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    35-53 W left arrow 55-75 W
  • Default TDP
    45 W left arrow 55 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    95 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Rembrandt R left arrow Fire Range
  • L2-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 12 MB
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 64 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-5-7235hs.html left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-9-9850hx.html
  • Socket
    FP7r2 left arrow FL1
  • Technology
    TSMC 6nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons