Family illustration.
What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 3 8305G or AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 3 8305G has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2025-12-04.
AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a base frequency of 2 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 35 W.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 70% better clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 2% higher specified turbo frequency
Common positions AMD Ryzen 3 8305G CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Reasons to consider More number of cores
2 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
AMD Ryzen 3 8305G
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and AMD Ryzen 3 8305G. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 3 8305G and AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 3 8305G and AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.