AMD FX-9800P
Intel Core i5-6200U
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-9800P vs Intel Core i5-6200U. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
AMD FX-9800P
AMD FX-9800P
Released
Q3/2015
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-6200U

What's the best choice AMD FX-9800P or Intel Core i5-6200U? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD FX-9800P has a base frequency of 2.70 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q2/2016.

Intel Core i5-6200U has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q3/2015.

Differences

AMD FX-9800P Reasons to consider
AMD FX-9800P
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 17% better clock speed

    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    4 left arrow 2
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 29% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-9800P CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    878 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    823 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    991 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    960 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    388 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    280 left arrow place

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-6200U CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    312 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    307 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    438 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    408 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    693 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    733 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    892 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    938 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    874 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    181 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    467 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    515 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    455 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    530 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    136 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    772 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-9800P AMD FX-9800P
Intel Core i5-6200U Intel Core i5-6200U
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD FX-9800 left arrow Intel Core i 6000U
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow Intel Core i5
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 6
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.7 GHz left arrow 2.3 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Core Configuration
    4x left arrow -
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.6 GHz left arrow 2.8 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    3.1 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.7 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow 24
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 9
  • GPU Frequency
    760 MHz left arrow 300 MHz
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) left arrow Intel HD Graphics 520
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 1000 MHz
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q3/2015
  • Shader
    512 left arrow 192
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-6200U and AMD FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    29.9 GB/s left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-1866 left arrow DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe
    3.0 x 8 left arrow -
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 12
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 3.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-9800P and Intel Core i5-6200U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    90 °C left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    15 W left arrow 15 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-9800P and Intel Core i5-6200U, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Excavator (Bristol Ridge) left arrow Skylake U
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L2-Cache
    2 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    - left arrow 3 MB
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q3/2015
  • Socket
    FP4 left arrow BGA 1356
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-9800P and Intel Core i5-6200U.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

77.000000
AMD FX-9800P
119.000000
Intel Core i5-6200U
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

237.000000
AMD FX-9800P
290.000000
Intel Core i5-6200U
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

475.000000
AMD FX-9800P
566.000000
Intel Core i5-6200U
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1288.000000
AMD FX-9800P
1346.000000
Intel Core i5-6200U
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

782.000000
AMD FX-9800P
384.000000
Intel Core i5-6200U

Latest comparisons