AMD FX-8320
Intel Core i5-2500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-8320 vs Intel Core i5-2500. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2012
AMD FX-8320
AMD FX-8320
Released
Q1/2011
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Core i5-2500

What's the best choice AMD FX-8320 or Intel Core i5-2500? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD FX-8320 has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2012.

Intel Core i5-2500 has a base frequency of 3.30 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. Released in Q1/2011.

Differences

AMD FX-8320 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8320
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    3.5 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 8% higher specified turbo frequency

    4 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8320 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    500 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    368 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    809 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    482 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    934 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    695 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    614 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    380 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    547 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    311 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    485 place
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    95 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-2500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    314 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    290 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1469 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
Intel Core i5-2500 Intel Core i5-2500
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD FX-8000 left arrow Intel Core i 2000
  • Family
    FX-Series left arrow Intel Core i5
  • Form Factor
    Desktops left arrow -
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Series
    FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.5 GHz left arrow 3.3 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4 GHz left arrow -
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4 GHz left arrow 3.7 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    3.75 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow No turbo
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 10.1
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 6
  • Generation
    - left arrow 6
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 850 MHz
  • GPU name
    None left arrow Intel HD Graphics 2000
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 1100 MHz
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 2
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q1/2011
  • Shader
    - left arrow 48
  • Technology
    - left arrow 32 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-2500 and AMD FX-8320. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    - left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR3-1333
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 16
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 2.0
  • System Memory Specification
    1866 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-8320 and Intel Core i5-2500 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Default TDP
    125 W left arrow -
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    61.1 °C left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    125 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8320 and Intel Core i5-2500, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Vishera (Bulldozer) left arrow Sandy Bridge S
  • Codename
    Vishera left arrow -
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L1-Cache
    0.375 MB left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    8 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 6 MB
  • Manufacturer product ID (boxed)
    FD8320FRHKBOX left arrow -
  • Manufacturer product ID (tray)
    FD8320FRW8KHK left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow Q1/2011
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow LGA 1155
  • Technology
    32nm SOI left arrow 32 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

Latest comparisons