What's the best choice AMD FX-8320 or AMD FX-6100? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD FX-8320 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q4/2012.
AMD FX-6100 has a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 95 W. Released in Q4/2011.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 6% better clock speed
3.30 GHz
More number of cores
2 times more cores
6
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 3% better overclocked clock speed
3.90 GHz
Common positions AMD FX-8320 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Performance per watt
About 0.76 times less performance per watt
125 W
Common positions AMD FX-6100 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD FX-8320
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
1
AMD FX-6100/6200
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
3.30 GHz
6
3.90 GHz
6
No
Yes
normal
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
no iGPU
No turbo
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-6100 and AMD FX-8320. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR3-1866
Yes
2
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-8320 and AMD FX-6100 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8320 and AMD FX-8320, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
8.00 MB
Zambezi (Bulldozer)
32 nm
AM3+
Q4/2011
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-8320 and AMD FX-6100.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
