AMD EPYC 9174F
Intel Core i9-13900K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD EPYC 9174F vs Intel Core i9-13900K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2022
AMD EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 9174F
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-13900K

What's the best choice AMD EPYC 9174F or Intel Core i9-13900K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD EPYC 9174F has a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. 16 / 32 Cores. Power consumption of 320 W. Released in Q4/2022.

Intel Core i9-13900K has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

AMD EPYC 9174F Reasons to consider
AMD EPYC 9174F
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    30 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD EPYC 9174F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    38 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    99 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    52 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    12 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 1.5 times more cores

    24 left arrow 16
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.39 times less performance per watt

    125 W left arrow 320 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    12 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    13 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    10 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    9 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    18 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    32 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    355 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    20 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Blender 3.1 Benchmark
    5 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 9174F
Intel Core i9-13900K Intel Core i9-13900K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    AMD EPYC left arrow Intel Core i9
  • CPU group
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow Intel Core i 13000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 13
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Intel Core i9-12900K
  • Successor
    -- left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.45 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 32
  • Shader
    left arrow 256
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 16 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 4
  • Generation
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 10 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2022
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-5600
  • Max. Memory
    6144 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • Memory channels
    12 left arrow 2
  • Bandwidth
    461.0 GB/s left arrow 89.6 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 5.0 x 20
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD EPYC 9174F and Intel Core i9-13900K to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    320 W left arrow 125 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    -- left arrow 241 W
  • TDP up
    400 W left arrow No
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow No
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9174F and AMD EPYC 9174F, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    SP5 left arrow LGA 1700
  • L2-Cache
    16.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    256.00 MB left arrow 36.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Genoa (Zen 4) left arrow Raptor Lake S
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q4/2022

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD EPYC 9174F and Intel Core i9-13900K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons