AMD Athlon X4 845
Intel Core i7-3770
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Athlon X4 845 vs Intel Core i7-3770. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD Athlon X4 845
Released
Q2/2012
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-3770

What's the best choice AMD Athlon X4 845 or Intel Core i7-3770? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Athlon X4 845 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Core i7-3770 has a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 77 W. Released in Q2/2012.

Differences

AMD Athlon X4 845 Reasons to consider
AMD Athlon X4 845
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1048 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 77 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Athlon X4 845 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    832 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    709 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    536 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    418 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    416 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    420 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    765 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    831 left arrow score
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 3 % better overclocked clock speed

    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i7-3770 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    348 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    291 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    460 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    356 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    596 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    447 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    750 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    703 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1164 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    54 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    345 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    282 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    176 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    266 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    310 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    577 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
Intel Core i7-3770 Intel Core i7-3770
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Athlon left arrow Intel Core i7
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD Athlon X4 (Carizzo) left arrow Intel Core i 3000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.80 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    3.80 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 4000
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.15 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 16
  • Shader
    left arrow 128
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11.0
  • Technology
    left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2011
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i7-3770 and AMD Athlon X4 845. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-2133 left arrow
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 32 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    8 left arrow 16
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Athlon X4 845 and Intel Core i7-3770 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 77 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Athlon X4 845 and AMD Athlon X4 845, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Carizzo left arrow Ivy Bridge S
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    FM2+ left arrow LGA 1155
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q2/2012

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Athlon X4 845 and Intel Core i7-3770.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
93
AMD Athlon X4 845
134
Intel Core i7-3770
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
316
AMD Athlon X4 845
669
Intel Core i7-3770
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2526
AMD Athlon X4 845
3424
Intel Core i7-3770
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
8576
AMD Athlon X4 845
13296
Intel Core i7-3770
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.04
AMD Athlon X4 845
1.65
Intel Core i7-3770
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
4.03
AMD Athlon X4 845
7.48
Intel Core i7-3770
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
5917
AMD Athlon X4 845
9418
Intel Core i7-3770

Latest comparisons