AMD EPYC 9654P
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2022
AMD EPYC 9654P

Processor AMD EPYC 9654P, specifications and benchmarks

AMD EPYC 9654P Processor is being reviewed, the release of which was held in Q4/2022. Here are all the AMD EPYC 9654P’s specifications and performance estimation in benchmark. We offer to study all the data and compare it with a competing model. The base clock frequency of the model is 2.40 GHz, total of cores is 96 / 192. The CPU supports DDR5-4800 and is installed in the motherboard on Socket SP5. The TDP for CPU is 360 W.

Specifications

Technical data

Legacy catalog specifications; the original verification date is not recorded.

CPU generation and family
  • CPU group
    AMD EPYC 9004
  • Family
    AMD EPYC
  • Generation
    4
  • Name
    AMD EPYC 9654P
  • Predecessor
    —
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server
  • Successor
    —
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
  • Base Frequency
    2.4 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal
  • Core Configuration
    96x Zen 4
  • CPU Cores
    96
  • CPU Threads
    192
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes
  • Overclocking
    No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.7 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (96 Cores)
    3.55 GHz
Internal Graphics
  • DirectX Version
    —
  • Execution units
    —
  • Generation
    —
  • GPU Frequency
    —
  • GPU name
    no iGPU
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo
  • Max. displays
    —
  • Max. GPU Memory
    —
  • Release date
    —
  • Shader
    —
  • Technology
    —
Hardware codec support
  • AV1
    No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No
  • JPEG
    No
  • VC-1
    No
  • VP8
    No
  • VP9
    No
Memory & PCIe
  • ECC
    Yes
  • Max. Memory
    6144 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    461 GB/s
  • Memory channels
    12
  • Memory type
    DDR5-4800
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes
Thermal Management
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    360 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    —
  • TDP down
    320 W
  • TDP up
    400 W
Technical details
  • Architecture
    Genoa (Zen 4)
  • Chip design
    Chiplet
  • Documents
    Technical data sheet
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • L2-Cache
    96.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    384.00 MB
  • Operating systems
    Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Part Number
    100-000000803
  • Release date
    Q4/2022
  • Release price
    10625 $
  • Socket
    SP5
  • Technology
    5 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM
Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD EPYC 9654P CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    579 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1 place

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPU

Compare the scores of popular benchmarks AMD EPYC 9654P with other processors to understand the real speed of the CPU when processing content.

Tests include mathematical calculations, creation of 3D models, cryptocurrency mining, tests in single and multi-core modes.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

846
AMD EPYC 9654P
850
849
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

68024
AMD EPYC 9654P
68024
38211

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

The values are used to select the optimal cooling system and power supply.

Rate the processor
AMD EPYC 9654P

Latest comparisons