Common positions Intel Core i9-13900HX CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Published results: 12
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 395.004333 samples/min Submissions: 8 |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 361.636386 samples/min Submissions: 88 |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 313.229039 samples/min Submissions: 48 |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.871804 samples/min Submissions: 57 |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 294.767578 samples/min Submissions: 62 |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.685394 samples/min Submissions: 25 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 434.178371 samples/min Submissions: 32 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.602066 samples/min Submissions: 73 |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.271086 samples/min Submissions: 9 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 426.53273 samples/min Submissions: 5 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 291.153005 samples/min Submissions: 7 |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 377.58323 samples/min Submissions: 9 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 1675 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 121.4 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 9669.926721 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 1034.134 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 29376 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 2057 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 11164 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 790 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 4502 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 299 points | System: Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25 CPU / power label: i9-13900HX 150 W / 135 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 140 W 12 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
Compare the scores of popular benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX with other processors to understand the real speed of the CPU when processing content.
Tests include mathematical calculations, creation of 3D models, cryptocurrency mining, tests in single and multi-core modes.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.
*
PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.
The values are used to select the optimal cooling system and power supply.