Intel Core i9-13900H

Specifications Benchmarks Synonyms

Specifications

Technical data

CPU generation and family

CPU group
Intel Core i 13000H
Family
Intel Core i9
Generation
13
Name
Intel Core i9-13900H
Predecessor
Intel Core i9-12900H
Segment
Mobile
Successor
—

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

A-Core
6x Raptor Cove
A-Core Frequency
2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz)
B-Core
8x Gracemont
B-Core Frequency
1.90 GHz (4.10 GHz)
Core architecture
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
CPU Cores
14
CPU Threads
20
Hyperthreading / SMT
Yes
Overclocking
No

Internal Graphics

DirectX Version
12.1
Execution units
96
Generation
13
GPU Frequency
400 MHz
GPU name
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
GPU Turbo
1500 MHz
Max. displays
4
Max. GPU Memory
32 GB
Release date
Q1/2022
Shader
768
Technology
10 nm

Hardware codec support

AV1
Decode
H.264 / AVC
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
VC-1
Decode
VP8
Decode
VP9
Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

ECC
No
Max. Memory
64 GB
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Memory channels
2 (Dual Channel)
Memory type
DDR4-3200DDR5-5200LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-6400
PCIe
5.0 x 20

Encryption

AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management

Maximum Operating Temperature
100 °C
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
45 W
TDP (PL2)
115 W
TDP down
35 W
TDP up
—

Technical details

Architecture
Raptor Lake H
Chip design
Monolithic
Documents
Technical data sheet
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
L2-Cache
—
L3-Cache
24 MB
Operating systems
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Part Number
—
Release date
Q1/2023
Release price
700 $
Socket
BGA 1744
Technology
10 nm
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i9-13900H CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

33 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

47 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

52 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

47 place
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

13 place
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

16 place

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPU

Published results: 13

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core i9-13900H
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux	258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows	212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows	201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux	195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows	151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows	206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux	180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows	196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux	239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux	230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows	165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16

More tests: 1

Test and settings	Intel Core i9-13900H
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows	214.871098 samples/min Submissions: 8

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
962 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
118.8 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows

Result	Reported conditions
5067.113924 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
18682 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
2020 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
7126 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
779 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
2885 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
292 points	System: Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM via Asus Deutschland CPU / power label: i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W Graphics: GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Compare the scores of popular benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H with other processors to understand the real speed of the CPU when processing content.

Tests include mathematical calculations, creation of 3D models, cryptocurrency mining, tests in single and multi-core modes.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1919

Intel Core i9-13900H

1940

Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)

1927

Intel Core i7-13800H

All the benchmark results

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

14632

Intel Core i9-13900H

14712

Intel Core i9-13900HK

14650

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

All the benchmark results

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

2230 GFLOPS

Intel Core i9-13900H

2332 GFLOPS

HiSilicon Kirin 9000

2290 GFLOPS

Apple M1 (7-GPU)

All the benchmark results

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

31788

Intel Core i9-13900H

33645

Intel Xeon Platinum 8268

33354

Intel Xeon W-3265M

All the benchmark results

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones

Higher values are better in this metric.

2617