Samsung Exynos 5800
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Samsung Exynos 5800 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2014
Samsung Exynos 5800
Samsung Exynos 5800
Released
Q2/2016
User rating
star star star star star
HiSilicon Kirin 658
HiSilicon Kirin 658

What's the best choice Samsung Exynos 5800 or HiSilicon Kirin 658? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Samsung Exynos 5800 has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q2/2014.

HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q2/2016.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 5800 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1452 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 31% better clock speed

    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 18 % higher specified turbo frequency

    2.35 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1243 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1125 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1661 place

Specifications

Technical data
Samsung Exynos 5800 Samsung Exynos 5800
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 650
  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 4
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    4x Cortex-A15 left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • B-Core
    4x Cortex-A7 left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • Base Frequency
    1.3 GHz left arrow 1.7 GHz
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2 GHz left arrow 2.35 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    2 GHz left arrow 2.35 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    Midgard 2 left arrow Midgard 4
  • GPU Frequency
    600 MHz left arrow 900 MHz
  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T628 MP6 left arrow ARM Mali-T830 MP2
  • GPU Turbo
    600 MHz left arrow 900 MHz
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 2
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow Q4/2015
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 32
  • Technology
    32nm left arrow 28nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No left arrow Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Samsung Exynos 5800. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    0 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Samsung Exynos 5800 and HiSilicon Kirin 658 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 5800 and HiSilicon Kirin 658, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 left arrow Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    Q2/2014 left arrow Q2/2016
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Samsung Exynos 5800 and HiSilicon Kirin 658.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

115.000000
Samsung Exynos 5800
41.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 658

Latest comparisons