Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Apple M1
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Apple M1. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Released
Q4/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Apple M1
Apple M1

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Apple M1? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 has a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. 12 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q3/2013.

Apple M1 has a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 15 W. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    746 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    4 times more cores

    12 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    371 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    204 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    809 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    200 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    975 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    338 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    534 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    48 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    494 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    130 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    310 place
Apple M1 Reasons to consider
Apple M1
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    182 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 16% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.12 times less performance per watt

    15 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    128 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    216 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    117 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    346 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    57 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    106 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    86 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Apple M1 Apple M1
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Apple M series
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow Apple M1
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.70 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.50 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    -- left arrow 4x Firestorm
  • B core
    -- left arrow 4x Icestorm
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Apple M1 (8 Core)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 1
  • Technology
    left arrow 5 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2020
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow LPDDR4X-4266
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 16 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Apple M1 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    130 W left arrow 15 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 20 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 10 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 16.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    30.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge EP left arrow M1
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011 left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q4/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Apple M1.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 SC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
651
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
1503
Apple M1
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Maxon's Cinebench R23 MC is a cross-platform test suite for macOs and Windows using a multi-core and hyperthreading
8249
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
7759
Apple M1
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
665
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
1742
Apple M1
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
7023
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
7650
Apple M1

Latest comparisons