Intel Xeon 676X
Intel Xeon 656
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon 676X vs Intel Xeon 656. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2026
Intel Xeon 676X

Family illustration. Credit: Intel Corporation.

Intel Xeon 676X
Released
Q1/2026
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Xeon 656

Family illustration. Credit: Intel Corporation.

Intel Xeon 656

What's the best choice Intel Xeon 676X or Intel Xeon 656? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Xeon 676X has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 32 / 64 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 275 W. Released in Q1/2026.

Intel Xeon 656 has a base frequency of 2.90 GHz. 20 / 40 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 210 W. Released in Q1/2026.

Differences

Intel Xeon 676X Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon 676X
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    12 more cores

    32 left arrow 20
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 2% higher specified turbo frequency

    4.90 GHz left arrow 4.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon 676X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
Intel Xeon 656 Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon 656
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 4% better clock speed

    2.90 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    210 W left arrow 275 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon 656 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon 676X Intel Xeon 676X
Intel Xeon 656 Intel Xeon 656
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Intel Xeon 6 left arrow Intel Xeon 6
  • Segment
    Workstation left arrow Workstation
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.8 GHz left arrow 2.9 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    32 left arrow 20
  • CPU Threads
    64 left arrow 40
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz left arrow 4.8 GHz
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon 656 and Intel Xeon 676X. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    4 TB left arrow 4 TB
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 8
  • Memory type
    DDR5 RDIMM-6400 left arrow DDR5 RDIMM-6400
  • PCIe lanes
    128 left arrow 128
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon 676X and Intel Xeon 656 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    275 W left arrow 210 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon 676X and Intel Xeon 656, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L3-Cache
    144 MB left arrow 72 MB
  • Official source
    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/244099/intel-xeon-676x-processor-144m-cache-2-80-ghz/specifications.html left arrow https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/244335/intel-xeon-656-processor-72m-cache-2-90-ghz/specifications.html
  • Official specification sheet
    https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/874103/Intel%20Xeon%20600%20Processors%20for%20Workstation%20-%20Product%20Brief_Rev1.pdf left arrow https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/874103/Intel%20Xeon%20600%20Processors%20for%20Workstation%20-%20Product%20Brief_Rev1.pdf
  • Release quarter
    Q1/2026 left arrow Q1/2026
  • Socket
    FCLGA4710 left arrow FCLGA4710
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons