Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3160
Released
Q2/2015
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Intel Atom x5-Z8500

What's the best choice Intel Celeron N3160 or Intel Atom x5-Z8500? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron N3160 has a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Atom x5-Z8500 has a maximum frequency of 1.44 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 2 W. Released in Q2/2015.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1483 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 10% better clock speed

    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.44 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1043 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    998 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1417 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1434 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1480 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    775 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    804 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    738 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    307 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1224 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    290 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    300 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1659 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.33 times less performance per watt

    2 W left arrow 6 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom x5-Z8500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1046 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    997 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1419 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1456 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1489 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    748 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    741 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    320 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1225 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow Intel Atom x3/x5/x7
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.44 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.24 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    2.24 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 400 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.32 GHz left arrow 0.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.64 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Atom x5-Z8500 and Intel Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Atom x5-Z8500 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    6 W left arrow 2 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Celeron N3160, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Braswell left arrow Cherry Trail
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 138
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q2/2015

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron N3160 and Intel Atom x5-Z8500.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
38
Intel Celeron N3160
38
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
136
Intel Celeron N3160
136
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
210
Intel Celeron N3160
203
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
709
Intel Celeron N3160
659
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
134
Intel Celeron N3160
126
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.44
Intel Celeron N3160
0.44
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.67
Intel Celeron N3160
1.67
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
13.3
Intel Celeron N3160
12.4
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1950
Intel Celeron N3160
1950
Intel Atom x5-Z8500

Latest comparisons