Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Atom E3815
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Atom E3815. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2014
Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Celeron N2830
Released
Q4/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom E3815
Intel Atom E3815

What's the best choice Intel Celeron N2830 or Intel Atom E3815? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron N2830 has a maximum frequency of 2.16 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 7.5 W. Released in Q1/2014.

Intel Atom E3815 has a maximum frequency of 1.46 GHz. 1 Cores. Power consumption of 5 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1632 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 32% better clock speed

    2.16 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • More number of cores

    1 times more cores

    2 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2830 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1039 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1042 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1516 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1685 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    847 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    877 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    674 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    811 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    377 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1324 place
Intel Atom E3815 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom E3815
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1650 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.67 times less performance per watt

    5 W left arrow 7.5 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom E3815 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1459 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1744 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    901 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    927 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    722 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    810 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    378 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1408 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N2830 Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Atom E3815 Intel Atom E3815
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow Intel Atom E3800
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.16 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 1
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.41 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 1
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.31 GHz left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.75 GHz left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron N2830 and Intel Atom E3815 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    7.5 W left arrow 5 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N2830 and Intel Celeron N2830, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q1/2014 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron N2830 and Intel Atom E3815.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
48
Intel Celeron N2830
26
Intel Atom E3815
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
902
Intel Celeron N2830
591
Intel Atom E3815
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1590
Intel Celeron N2830
591
Intel Atom E3815
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.39
Intel Celeron N2830
0.27
Intel Atom E3815
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
0.82
Intel Celeron N2830
0.27
Intel Atom E3815
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
5.4
Intel Celeron N2830
4.7
Intel Atom E3815
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1157
Intel Celeron N2830
384
Intel Atom E3815

Latest comparisons