AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2024-04-16
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Released
Q1/2025
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Family illustration.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Released in 2024-04-16.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a base frequency of 2.9 GHz. 16 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Released in Q1/2025.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 31% better clock speed

    3.8 GHz left arrow 2.9 GHz
  • More number of cores

    8 more cores

    16 left arrow 8
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 6 % higher specified turbo frequency

    5.4 GHz left arrow 5.1 GHz

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen PRO left arrow Intel Core Ultra Series 2
  • Form Factor
    Desktops / 1L Desktops / Laptops / Mobile Workstations left arrow -
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen PRO 8000 Series left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.8 GHz left arrow -
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 16
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 16
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz left arrow 5.4 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow -
  • E-core Base Clock
    - left arrow 2.7 GHz
  • Efficient Cores
    - left arrow 8
  • Low Power Efficient-cores
    - left arrow 2
  • P-core Base Clock
    - left arrow 2.9 GHz
  • Performance Cores
    - left arrow 6
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    2700 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon 780M left arrow Intel Arc 140T GPU
  • Graphics Cores
    12 left arrow -
  • GPU Turbo
    - left arrow 2350 MHz
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR5 (FP7r2) / LPDDR5X (FP7) left arrow Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow -
  • Max. Memory
    - left arrow 128 GB
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    35-54 W left arrow -
  • Default TDP
    45 W left arrow -
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow -
  • Maximum Turbo Power
    - left arrow 115 W
  • Minimum Assured Power
    - left arrow 35 W
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    - left arrow 45 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Codename
    Hawk Point left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    8 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 24 MB
  • Release date
    2024-04-16 left arrow Q1/2025
  • Socket
    FP7 / FP7r2 left arrow FCBGA2049
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow -
  • Official specification sheet
    - left arrow https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs
Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 3937 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 489 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 1142 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 126 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 6410.87284 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows
System RAM: 48 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Duration: 155.985 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 10 threads / windows

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 3268.230188 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 10 threads / windows
System RAM: 16 GB
OS: Windows NT 10.0
Duration: 305.976 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 20681 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 2105 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 8068 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 809 points System: GMK EVO-T1
CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W
Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz
RAM: 64 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Latest comparisons