AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Celeron N3000
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Intel Celeron N3000. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2009
AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Released
Q1/2015
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N3000
Intel Celeron N3000

What's the best choice AMD Phenom II X4 965 or Intel Celeron N3000? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Phenom II X4 965 has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 140 W. Released in Q3/2009.

Intel Celeron N3000 has a base frequency of 1.04 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 4 W. Released in Q1/2015.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 227% better clock speed

    3.40 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    498 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    410 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    817 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    653 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1020 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    877 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    674 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    499 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    561 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    432 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    756 place
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    4 W left arrow 140 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3000 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1026 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1034 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1267 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1283 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1434 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    856 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    877 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    769 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    797 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    325 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1170 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Phenom II X4 965 AMD Phenom II X4 965
Intel Celeron N3000 Intel Celeron N3000
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD Phenom II - 800/900 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
  • Family
    AMD Phenom II left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 8
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.4 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.08 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.08 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 12
  • Generation
    - left arrow 8
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 320 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 600 MHz
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q1/2015
  • Shader
    - left arrow 96
  • Technology
    - left arrow 14 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3000 and AMD Phenom II X4 965. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 2.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Phenom II X4 965 and Intel Celeron N3000 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    140 W left arrow 4 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Phenom II X4 965 and Intel Celeron N3000, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Deneb (K10) left arrow Braswell
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    6 MB left arrow 2 MB
  • Release date
    Q3/2009 left arrow Q1/2015
  • Socket
    AM3 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Phenom II X4 965 and Intel Celeron N3000.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

89.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
35.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

344.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
64.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

441.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
146.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1486.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
197.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

1816.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
874.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

6358.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
1508.000000
Intel Celeron N3000
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.030000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
0.410000
Intel Celeron N3000
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

4.060000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
0.790000
Intel Celeron N3000
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

4236.000000
AMD Phenom II X4 965
930.000000
Intel Celeron N3000

Latest comparisons