AMD Phenom II X4 955
Intel Pentium J2900
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs Intel Pentium J2900. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2009
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD Phenom II X4 955
Released
Q4/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Pentium J2900
Intel Pentium J2900

What's the best choice AMD Phenom II X4 955 or Intel Pentium J2900? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD Phenom II X4 955 has a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q2/2009.

Intel Pentium J2900 has a maximum frequency of 2.41 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 10 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1229 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.41 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X4 955 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    390 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    343 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    455 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    877 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    697 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1212 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1151 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    702 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    538 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    729 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    517 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    968 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1486 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.08 times less performance per watt

    10 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Pentium J2900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1022 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    952 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1648 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    822 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    727 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    652 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    681 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    360 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1228 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Phenom II X4 955 AMD Phenom II X4 955
Intel Pentium J2900 Intel Pentium J2900
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Phenom II left arrow Intel Pentium
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 6
  • CPU group
    AMD Phenom II - 800/900 left arrow Intel Pentium J2000/N3500
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.41 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.67 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow 2.67 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.69 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 4
  • Shader
    left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Pentium J2900 and AMD Phenom II X4 955. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR2-1066 left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 4
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Phenom II X4 955 and Intel Pentium J2900 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W left arrow 10 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 105 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Phenom II X4 955 and AMD Phenom II X4 955, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    6.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Deneb (K10) left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    AM3 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q2/2009 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD Phenom II X4 955 and Intel Pentium J2900.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
84
AMD Phenom II X4 955
44
Intel Pentium J2900
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
324
AMD Phenom II X4 955
161
Intel Pentium J2900
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1709
AMD Phenom II X4 955
1042
Intel Pentium J2900
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
5984
AMD Phenom II X4 955
3537
Intel Pentium J2900
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.97
AMD Phenom II X4 955
0.5
Intel Pentium J2900
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
3.82
AMD Phenom II X4 955
1.95
Intel Pentium J2900
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
3987
AMD Phenom II X4 955
1931
Intel Pentium J2900

Latest comparisons