What's the best choice AMD G-T56N or AMD Opteron 3280? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD G-T56N has a base frequency of 1.65 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 18 W. Released in Q1/2011.
AMD Opteron 3280 has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2012.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
Common positions AMD G-T56N CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 45% better clock speed
1.65 GHz
More number of cores
6 more cores
2
Common positions AMD Opteron 3280 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD G-T56N
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
AMD Opteron 3000
AMD Opteron
1
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2.4 GHz
normal
8
8
No
No
3.5 GHz
-
2.7 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
-
-
-
-
no iGPU
No turbo
-
-
-
-
-
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD G-T56N. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Yes
2
DDR3-1866
16
2.0
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD G-T56N and AMD Opteron 3280 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
65 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD G-T56N and AMD Opteron 3280, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Zurich (Bulldozer)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
8.00 MB
Q1/2012
AM3+
32 nm
AMD-V
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD G-T56N and AMD Opteron 3280.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
