AMD FX-6200
AMD A10-6790K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-6200 vs AMD A10-6790K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2012
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-6200
Released
Q4/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD A10-6790K
AMD A10-6790K

What's the best choice AMD FX-6200 or AMD A10-6790K? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD FX-6200 has a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q2/2012.

AMD A10-6790K has a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 100 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Differences

AMD FX-6200 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-6200
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1117 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    6 left arrow 4

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-6200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    547 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    422 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1104 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    964 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    626 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    441 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    444 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    415 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    750 place
AMD A10-6790K Reasons to consider
AMD A10-6790K
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1268 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 5 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.30 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.8 times less performance per watt

    100 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-6790K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    951 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    800 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1108 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1141 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    541 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    592 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    524 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    358 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    481 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    874 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
AMD A10-6790K AMD A10-6790K
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-6100/6200 left arrow AMD A10-6000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.80 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    6 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.10 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    6 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon HD 8670D
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.84 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 6
  • Shader
    left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 5
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2013
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD A10-6790K and AMD FX-6200. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-6200 and AMD A10-6790K to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W left arrow 100 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-6200 and AMD FX-6200, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zambezi (Bulldozer) left arrow Richland (Piledriver)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow FM2
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-6200 and AMD A10-6790K.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
524
AMD FX-6200
522
AMD A10-6790K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1992
AMD FX-6200
1419
AMD A10-6790K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1989
AMD FX-6200
2140
AMD A10-6790K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
8054
AMD FX-6200
6114
AMD A10-6790K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1
AMD FX-6200
1.09
AMD A10-6790K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
4.42
AMD FX-6200
3.42
AMD A10-6790K
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
6180
AMD FX-6200
4724
AMD A10-6790K

Latest comparisons