AMD A8-6500
AMD FX-8370
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A8-6500 vs AMD FX-8370. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2013
AMD A8-6500
AMD A8-6500
Released
Q3/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-8370

What's the best choice AMD A8-6500 or AMD FX-8370? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD A8-6500 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q2/2013.

AMD FX-8370 has a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q3/2014.

Differences

AMD A8-6500 Reasons to consider
AMD A8-6500
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1352 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A8-6500 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    846 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    744 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1145 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1189 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    781 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    618 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    551 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    783 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    439 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    891 place
AMD FX-8370 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8370
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1006 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 5 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.30 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8370 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    525 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    374 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    806 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    444 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1048 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    804 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    580 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    350 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    354 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    282 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    588 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A8-6500 AMD A8-6500
AMD FX-8370 AMD FX-8370
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD A8-6000 left arrow AMD FX-8000
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    3.50 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.10 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 8570D left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.84 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow
  • Shader
    256 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    5 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-8370 and AMD A8-6500. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD A8-6500 and AMD FX-8370 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 125 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD A8-6500 and AMD A8-6500, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Richland (Piledriver) left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    FM2 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD A8-6500 and AMD FX-8370.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
90
AMD A8-6500
98
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
293
AMD A8-6500
673
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
489
AMD A8-6500
585
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1299
AMD A8-6500
2836
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2017
AMD A8-6500
2195
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
5781
AMD A8-6500
11300
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.92
AMD A8-6500
1.14
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
3.29
AMD A8-6500
7.02
AMD FX-8370
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
4579
AMD A8-6500
9176
AMD FX-8370

Latest comparisons