Qual é a melhor escolha Intel Core i7-13800H ou Intel Core i5-12600K? Qual é o processador mais rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-13800H has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (5.20 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Lançado em Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-12600K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Lançado em Q4/2021.
Razões a considerar Mais número de núcleos
4 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posições comuns Intel Core i7-13800H CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar
Intel Core i7-13800H
Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.
Codecs incorporados utilizados para codificar e descodificar o conteúdo. Acelera significativamente as operações necessárias.
Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por Intel Core i5-12600K e Intel Core i7-13800H. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.
Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP Intel Core i7-13800H e Intel Core i5-12600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por Intel Core i7-13800H e Intel Core i5-12600K, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13800H | Intel Core i5-12600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.330505 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 224.769114 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +36.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 198.6642 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 217.066649 samples/min Submissions: 96 | +9.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 5773.672055 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z690-P Duration: 173.2 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13800H | 7959.945554 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 17 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 125.629 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |