최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 또는 Intel Core i5-12400F? 哪种处理器更快？
최고의 프로세서를 선택하는 데 도움이 되는 비교 자료를 준비했습니다. 사양과 벤치마크를 비교해 보세요.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 Q1/2022.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 44% 더 나은 클럭 속도
2.50 GHz
더 많은 코어 수
2 more cores
6
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
공통 위치 Intel Core i5-12400F 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i5
-
12
Intel Core i5-11400F
Desktop / Server
-
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Golden Cove
2.5 GHz
normal
6
12
예
-
아니요
4.4 GHz
-
4 GHz
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
None
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 Intel Core i5-12400F 그리고 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
아니요
128 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
-
-
-
예
TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i5-12400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
100 °C
65 W
117 W
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i5-12400F, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Alder Lake S
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
-
7.5 MB
18 MB
-
-
-
-
Q1/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.081997 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 166.939907 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -3.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -2.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 181.03671 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 163.569856 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -9.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -9.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 188.63931 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -0.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.274174 samples/min Submissions: 50 | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -12.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.02372 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +2.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -11.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 197.967794 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +2.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.508577 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 199.716739 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +2.2 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | -8.6 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +0.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | -9.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
여러 벤치마크 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 제품 간의 성능 차이를 보다 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 그리고 Intel Core i5-12400F.
합성 테스트 값을 비교하여 최고의 프로세서를 선택하세요!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
