Quel est le meilleur choix ? AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ou Intel Core i5-12400F? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir le meilleur processeur. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en Q1/2022.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 44% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
2 more cores
Positions communes AMD Ryzen 7 3700X CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
Positions communes Intel Core i5-12400F CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i5-12400F et AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP AMD Ryzen 7 3700X et Intel Core i5-12400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par AMD Ryzen 7 3700X et Intel Core i5-12400F, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 172.081997 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 166.939907 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -3.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 173.786966 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -2.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 181.03671 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 163.569856 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -9.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 169.87457 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -9.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 189.39345 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 188.63931 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -0.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.274174 samples/min Submissions: 50 | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -12.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.02372 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +2.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.30955 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -11.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 193.296986 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 197.967794 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +2.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 164.46996 samples/min Submissions: 92 | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.508577 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 199.716739 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +2.2 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.575914 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | -8.6 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 196.530057 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +0.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 175.205341 samples/min Submissions: 120 | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | -9.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 8328.336332 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Duration: 120.072 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks, vous pouvez estimer avec plus de précision la différence de performance entre AMD Ryzen 7 3700X et Intel Core i5-12400F.
Comparez les valeurs des tests synthétiques et choisissez le meilleur processeur !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.