ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-13900K または AMD Ryzen 5 5600X? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2020-11-05.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 3% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
18 more cores
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900K 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i9-13900K
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X と Intel Core i9-13900K. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-13900K と AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-13900K と AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.547382 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 154.817758 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -69.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 521.395074 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 155.358716 samples/min Submissions: 20 | -70.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 543.710413 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 183.365978 samples/min Submissions: 76 | -66.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | 144.979041 samples/min Submissions: 165 | -70.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 523.732424 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 169.530851 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -67.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 464.937348 samples/min Submissions: 67 | 143.389987 samples/min Submissions: 120 | -69.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 592.433754 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 177.703614 samples/min Submissions: 41 | -70.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 466.656168 samples/min Submissions: 123 | 136.96555 samples/min Submissions: 172 | -70.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 536.977328 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 181.891479 samples/min Submissions: 47 | -66.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | 141.787816 samples/min Submissions: 198 | -70.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 569.007612 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 182.262754 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -68.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 487.07809 samples/min Submissions: 173 | 150.117268 samples/min Submissions: 106 | -69.2 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 596.916385 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 178.569622 samples/min Submissions: 38 | -70.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | 147.415889 samples/min Submissions: 280 | -70.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 6969.126768 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / X570 AORUS ELITE Duration: 143.49 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i9-13900K と AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.