최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? Intel Core i9-13900K 또는 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X? 哪种处理器更快？
최고의 프로세서를 선택하는 데 도움이 되는 비교 자료를 준비했습니다. 사양과 벤치마크를 비교해 보세요.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 에 출시 Q4/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 2020-11-05.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 3% 더 나은 클럭 속도
3.7 GHz
더 많은 코어 수
18 more cores
6
공통 위치 Intel Core i9-13900K 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
Intel Core i9-13900K
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
AMD Ryzen 5000
Ryzen
4
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop
-
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Ryzen 5000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
-
3.7 GHz
normal
6
12
예
예
4.6 GHz
-
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
-
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900K. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
예
128 GB
-
2
DDR4
PCIe 4.0
20
4.0
3200
예
TDP 요구 사항 비교 Intel Core i9-13900K 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 °C
65 W
-
-
-
65 W
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 Intel Core i9-13900K 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Vermeer (Zen 3)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
3 MB
32 MB
2020-11-05
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Vermeer
100-000000065
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.547382 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 154.817758 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -69.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 521.395074 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 155.358716 samples/min Submissions: 20 | -70.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 543.710413 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 183.365978 samples/min Submissions: 76 | -66.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | 144.979041 samples/min Submissions: 165 | -70.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 523.732424 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 169.530851 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -67.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 464.937348 samples/min Submissions: 67 | 143.389987 samples/min Submissions: 120 | -69.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 592.433754 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 177.703614 samples/min Submissions: 41 | -70.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 466.656168 samples/min Submissions: 123 | 136.96555 samples/min Submissions: 172 | -70.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 536.977328 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 181.891479 samples/min Submissions: 47 | -66.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | 141.787816 samples/min Submissions: 198 | -70.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 569.007612 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 182.262754 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -68.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 487.07809 samples/min Submissions: 173 | 150.117268 samples/min Submissions: 106 | -69.2 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900K | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 596.916385 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 178.569622 samples/min Submissions: 38 | -70.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | 147.415889 samples/min Submissions: 280 | -70.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 6969.126768 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / X570 AORUS ELITE Duration: 143.49 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
여러 벤치마크 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 제품 간의 성능 차이를 보다 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. Intel Core i9-13900K 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.
합성 테스트 값을 비교하여 최고의 프로세서를 선택하세요!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
