ベストな選択とは Intel Core i7-13700KF または Intel Core i7-1255U? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-13700KF has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz (5.40 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
Intel Core i7-1255U has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 10 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
より多くのコア数
6 more cores
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-13700KF 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-1255U 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i7-13700KF
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i7-1255U と Intel Core i7-13700KF. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i7-13700KF と Intel Core i7-1255U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i7-13700KF と Intel Core i7-1255U, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13700KF | Intel Core i7-1255U | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 377.484596 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 72.500587 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -80.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 359.623683 samples/min Submissions: 83 | 73.828397 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -79.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.747216 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 72.326994 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -79.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 368.061163 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 72.096635 samples/min Submissions: 25 | -80.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.406062 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 78.804508 samples/min Submissions: 60 | -78.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 380.945816 samples/min Submissions: 114 | 76.175019 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -80.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1255U | 2858.106447 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 8 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / 21E60050UK Duration: 349.882 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700KF | 13077.365695 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.17.0 / 1M / 18 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25) Duration: 76.468 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |