ベストな選択とは Intel Core i7-12700H または AMD Ryzen 9 7900? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i7-12700H has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2023-01-14.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
より多くのコア数
2 more cores
12
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-12700H 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 61% クロックスピードの向上
2.30 GHz
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 15 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.70 GHz
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7900 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i7-12700H
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
AMD Ryzen 7000
Ryzen
6
AMD Ryzen 9 5900
Desktop
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Ryzen 7000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
-
3.7 GHz
normal
12
24
はい
はい
5.4 GHz
-
12x
5.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
12
2
9
2200 MHz
AMD Radeon Graphics
2200 MHz
3
8 GB
Q3/2022
128
5 nm
2
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
いいえ
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 と Intel Core i7-12700H. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
はい
128 GB
2
DDR5
PCIe 5.0
83.2 GB/s
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i7-12700H と AMD Ryzen 9 7900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 °C
65 W
-
65 W
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i7-12700H と AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Raphael (Zen 4)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512
12 MB
64 MB
2023-01-14
AM5
TSMC 5nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Chiplet
Raphael AM5
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
429 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 171.747624 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 402.094544 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +134.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 189.136701 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 402.076116 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +112.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 183.839528 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 434.607956 samples/min Submissions: 71 | +136.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.366816 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 370.502053 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +116.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 160.170807 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 417.62517 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +160.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 194.511825 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 361.246155 samples/min Submissions: 28 | +85.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 220.248805 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 444.072007 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +101.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.836398 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 388.422041 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +123.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 227.527826 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 435.700715 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +91.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.642257 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 360.683488 samples/min Submissions: 30 | +116.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 210.522717 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 448.997736 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +113.3 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.496699 samples/min Submissions: 27 | 371.969605 samples/min Submissions: 30 | +116.9 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 282.531205 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 453.937392 samples/min Submissions: 87 | +60.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 185.722833 samples/min Submissions: 88 | 371.910741 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +100.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700H | 6305.822292 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 17 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / INVALID Duration: 1585.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 15889.384461 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 629.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i7-12700H と AMD Ryzen 9 7900.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
