ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D または AMD Ryzen 9 7900? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. で発売されました。 2023-04-06.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2023-01-14.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 14% クロックスピードの向上
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
4 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 8 % higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7900 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 と AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 15
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 311.163632 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 423.158207 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +36.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 293.059443 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 402.094544 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +37.2 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 289.884349 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 402.076116 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +38.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 318.901589 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 434.607956 samples/min Submissions: 71 | +36.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 262.013881 samples/min Submissions: 304 | 370.502053 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +41.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 302.968143 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 417.62517 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +37.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 255.841339 samples/min Submissions: 169 | 361.246155 samples/min Submissions: 28 | +41.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 325.124482 samples/min Submissions: 29 | 444.072007 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +36.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 252.365344 samples/min Submissions: 333 | 388.422041 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +53.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 318.218013 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 435.700715 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +36.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 255.855441 samples/min Submissions: 410 | 360.683488 samples/min Submissions: 30 | +41.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 328.969128 samples/min Submissions: 33 | 448.997736 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +36.5 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 264.848985 samples/min Submissions: 310 | 371.969605 samples/min Submissions: 30 | +40.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 324.125082 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 453.937392 samples/min Submissions: 87 | +40.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 265.58705 samples/min Submissions: 555 | 371.910741 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +40.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 2974 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 291 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 7121 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 709 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 18086 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 1820 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 15889.384461 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 629.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 11512.514103 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B650E AORUS ELITE X AX ICE Duration: 86.862 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.