ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D または AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. で発売されました。 2023-02-28.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. で発売されました。 2022-09-27.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
より多くのコア数
4 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 2% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 12% クロックスピードの向上
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 16
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 569.736805 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 443.731777 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -22.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 620.937512 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 471.839034 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -24.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 592.595948 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | -32.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 595.742958 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 465.200088 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -21.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 646.058914 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -25.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 532.281097 samples/min Submissions: 149 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | -23.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 637.902266 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 481.756648 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -24.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 523.063545 samples/min Submissions: 145 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | -25.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 653.198149 samples/min Submissions: 76 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -26.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.269654 samples/min Submissions: 174 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | -23.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.409127 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -22.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.583496 samples/min Submissions: 419 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | -22.7 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 669.045567 samples/min Submissions: 42 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -23.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 534.444297 samples/min Submissions: 171 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | -25.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 649.385297 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 504.18409 samples/min Submissions: 22 | -22.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 535.882023 samples/min Submissions: 392 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | -23.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 5974 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 326 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14188 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 795 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 36291 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2053 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 21990.588028 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 45.474 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.