최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 또는 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? 哪种处理器更快?
최고의 프로세서를 선택하는 데 도움이 되는 비교 자료를 준비했습니다. 사양과 벤치마크를 비교해 보세요.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. 에 출시 2023-02-28.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 에 출시 2022-09-27.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
더 많은 코어 수
4 more cores
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도
주변 2% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 12% 더 나은 클럭 속도
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Shared tests with results for both models: 16
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 569.736805 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 443.731777 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -22.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 620.937512 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 471.839034 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -24.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 592.595948 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | -32.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 595.742958 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 465.200088 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -21.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 646.058914 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -25.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 532.281097 samples/min Submissions: 149 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | -23.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 637.902266 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 481.756648 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -24.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 523.063545 samples/min Submissions: 145 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | -25.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 653.198149 samples/min Submissions: 76 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -26.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.269654 samples/min Submissions: 174 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | -23.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.409127 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -22.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.583496 samples/min Submissions: 419 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | -22.7 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 669.045567 samples/min Submissions: 42 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -23.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 534.444297 samples/min Submissions: 171 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | -25.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 649.385297 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 504.18409 samples/min Submissions: 22 | -22.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 535.882023 samples/min Submissions: 392 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | -23.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 5974 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 326 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14188 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 795 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 36291 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2053 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 21990.588028 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 45.474 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
여러 벤치마크 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 제품 간의 성능 차이를 보다 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 그리고 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.
합성 테스트 값을 비교하여 최고의 프로세서를 선택하세요!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.