ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D または AMD Ryzen 7 7700? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a base frequency of 4.2 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. で発売されました。 2023-02-28.
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2023-01-14.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 11% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
8 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 8% higher specified turbo frequency
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 7 7700 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 7 7700 と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 7 7700, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 15
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 632.391726 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 312.600652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -50.6 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 577.939195 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 280.488216 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -51.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 592.595948 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 284.160156 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -52.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 595.742958 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 285.219773 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -52.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 646.058914 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 317.664112 samples/min Submissions: 35 | -50.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 532.281097 samples/min Submissions: 149 | 261.399837 samples/min Submissions: 121 | -50.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 637.902266 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 313.81982 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -50.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 523.063545 samples/min Submissions: 145 | 258.312979 samples/min Submissions: 159 | -50.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 653.198149 samples/min Submissions: 76 | 323.528403 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -50.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.269654 samples/min Submissions: 174 | 252.067854 samples/min Submissions: 61 | -50.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 635.409127 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 318.591088 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -49.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 512.583496 samples/min Submissions: 419 | 254.225555 samples/min Submissions: 58 | -50.4 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 534.444297 samples/min Submissions: 171 | 250.533091 samples/min Submissions: 25 | -53.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 649.385297 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 321.732198 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -50.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 535.882023 samples/min Submissions: 392 | 265.944107 samples/min Submissions: 37 | -50.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 5974 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 326 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14188 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 795 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 36291 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2053 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 7947.483032 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B850M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 125.826 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 21990.588028 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 45.474 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D と AMD Ryzen 7 7700.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.