ベストな選択とは AMD Ryzen 9 7900 または AMD Ryzen 9 7950X? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2023-01-14.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. で発売されました。 2022-09-27.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7900 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 22% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
4 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 6 % higher specified turbo frequency
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X と AMD Ryzen 9 7900. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen 9 7900 と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 と AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 15
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 423.158207 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 632.530096 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +49.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 402.094544 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 577.564381 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +43.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 402.076116 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 599.189804 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +49.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 434.607956 samples/min Submissions: 71 | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | +47.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 370.502053 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | +45.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 417.62517 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 627.290228 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +50.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 361.246155 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 533.737601 samples/min Submissions: 202 | +47.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 444.072007 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 644.599619 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +45.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.422041 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | +34.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 435.700715 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 639.162595 samples/min Submissions: 82 | +46.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 360.683488 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | +46.3 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 448.997736 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 672.672632 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +49.8 % |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 371.969605 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | +48.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 453.937392 samples/min Submissions: 87 | 658.852208 samples/min Submissions: 132 | +45.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 371.910741 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | +47.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 15889.384461 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 629.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |