NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Differenze Specifiche Benchmark (test) Testimonianze

Differenze

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

Segnala un bug

Velocità di clock più alta

Intorno a 28% migliore velocità di clock

2 GHz 1.56 GHz

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Segnala un bug

Più memoria

200% più memoria

24 GB 8 GB

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti GPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

Passmark Performance Test GPU

1 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Informazioni generali

Confronto dei dati tecnici di base delle schede grafiche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 e NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, chip, unità di elaborazione delle informazioni.

Architettura

Pascal Ampere
Execution Units

1920 -
Chip GPU

GP104 GA102-350-A1
L1 Cache

48 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache

2 MB 6 MB
Unità di uscita del rendering

64 112
Unità di texture

120 336
Basato su

- GA102
CUDA Cores

- 10752
Shader

- 10752

Impostazioni di memoria

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bandwidth

256.3 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Memory Bus

256 bit 384 bit
Memory Clock

2000 MHz -
Memory Data Rate

8 Gbps -
Dimensione della memoria

8 GB 24 GB
Tipo di memoria

GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory Speed (legacy frequency label)

- 1300 MHz

Frequenza di clock

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Frequenza di base

1506 MHz 1560 MHz
Frequenza massima

1683 MHz 1860 MHz
Overclock

- No

Consumo di energia

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

System Power Supply

450 W (PSU recommendation) 850 W (System power requirement)
TDP

150 W 450 W
Graphics Card Power

- 450 W
Maximum GPU Temperature

- 92 °C

Interfacce

Connettività e collegamenti.

DisplayPort Ports

3 × DisplayPort 1.4a 3 × DisplayPort 1.4a
Porte DVI

1 × DVI -
Porte HDMI

1 × HDMI 2.0 1 × HDMI 2.1
Max. Visualizzazioni

5 4
PCIe Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors

1x 8-pin 3x PCIe 8-pin cables (adapter in box) OR 450W or greater PCIe Gen 5 cable
HDCP Version

- 2.3
Other Display Outputs (unparsed)

- HDMI

Dati tecnici

Dati tecnici utilizzati al massimo delle loro potenzialità nei giochi per computer.

CUDA

6.1 -
DirectX

12.1 12_2
Risoluzione massima

3840 × 2160 7680 × 4320
OpenCL

3.0 3.0
OpenGL

4.6 4.6
Shader Model

6.7 (6.4) 6.6
Vulkan

1.3 1.3

Dimensioni

La differenza di dimensioni, peso e slot dei dispositivi a confronto

Altezza

40 mm -
Lunghezza

267 mm -
Slot Size

Dual-slot -
Width

112 mm -

Ulteriori informazioni

Confronto tra le interfacce e le date di rilascio per le GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti e NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

Process Technology

16 nm 8 nm
Data di rilascio

Q3/2016 -
Manufacturer specification scope

- NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ.

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

101.0 GFLOPS (1:64) 40 TFLOPS
FP32 (theoretical)

6.463 TFLOPS 40 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

202.0 GFLOPS (1:32) 0.625 TFLOPS
Pixel Rate

107.7 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

202.0 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance GPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 14

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 5.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	481.6157 samples/min Submissions: 20	5250.819731 samples/min Submissions: 11	+990.3 %
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows	444.806088 samples/min Submissions: 11	5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5	+1127.3 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Linux	525.482173 samples/min Submissions: 16	5309.43807 samples/min Submissions: 24	+910.4 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows	520.511331 samples/min Submissions: 62	5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115	+973.0 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Linux	544.297956 samples/min Submissions: 15	4979.851473 samples/min Submissions: 8	+814.9 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows	522.08629 samples/min Submissions: 62	5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51	+991.9 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Linux	531.884683 samples/min Submissions: 7	5840.23445 samples/min Submissions: 8	+998.0 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows	521.037577 samples/min Submissions: 56	5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35	+953.7 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Linux	551.555412 samples/min Submissions: 11	5972.585335 samples/min Submissions: 15	+982.9 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	532.275463 samples/min Submissions: 81	5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51	+965.8 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Linux	555.845146 samples/min Submissions: 9	6034.022292 samples/min Submissions: 7	+985.6 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows	543.479512 samples/min Submissions: 41	5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32	+961.7 %

More tests: 2

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux	544.324065 samples/min Submissions: 14	6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16	+1033.2 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows	538.994218 samples/min Submissions: 115	5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111	+850.7 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.