Qual è la scelta migliore AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X o AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X? Quale processore è più veloce?
Abbiamo preparato un confronto per aiutarvi a scegliere il processore migliore. Confrontate le loro specifiche e i loro benchmark.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 180 W. Rilasciato in 2017-07-31.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 180 W. Rilasciato in 2017-07-31.
Motivi da considerare Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 3% migliore velocità di clock
Posizioni comuni AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Più numero di core
4 more cores
Posizioni comuni AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X e AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X e AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X e AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 2
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 226.920582 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 301.065945 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +32.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.163157 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 260.478469 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +34.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 8155.74205 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Duration: 122.613 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 9048.136084 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG ZENITH EXTREME Duration: 110.52 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Sulla base dei risultati di diversi benchmark, è possibile stimare con maggiore precisione la differenza di prestazioni tra AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X e AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Confrontate i valori dei test sintetici e scegliete il processore migliore!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Lower values are better; time in seconds.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.