Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G

Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2021
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
Released
Q4/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G

What's the best choice Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled or GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled has a maximum frequency of 1.825 GHz. Memory size 16 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q3/2021.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G has a maximum frequency of 1.530 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    282 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 16% better clock speed

    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.530 GHz
  • More memory

    75% more memory

    16 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    328 place
  • Battlefield 5
    98 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    257 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    308 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    689 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    514 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    172 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    367 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2562 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2654 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2488 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2514 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2663 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2285 place

Specifications

Technical data
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 left arrow TU116-250-KA-A1
  • Execution units
    80 left arrow 20
  • Shader
    5120 left arrow 1280
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    320 left arrow 80
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    2 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 192 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.825 GHz left arrow 1.530 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.425 GHz+ 8 % left arrow 1.740 GHz+ 1 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.235 GHz+ 11 % left arrow 1.725 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    400 W+ 33 % left arrow 100 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 100 mm left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    320 mm left arrow 172 mm
  • Height
    135 mm left arrow 122 mm
  • Width
    58 mm left arrow 40 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G and Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2021 left arrow Q4/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    11308-11-20G left arrow GV-N165SOC-4GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled and GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
24.83
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
4.45
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
114 fps (avg)
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
34 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
78 fps (avg)
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
19 fps (avg)
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
122 MH/s
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
36 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
30 MH/s
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Air Cooled
12 MH/s
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC 4G
-->

Latest comparisons