Select processor 1
Select processor 2
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB). Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
—
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB

Credit: Official Sapphire product photograph.

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB
Released
—
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

Family illustration.

AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

What's the best choice SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB or AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)? Which graphics card is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6.

AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB and AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB), chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 9060 left arrow AMD Radeon RX 9050
  • Board Manufacturer
    Sapphire left arrow -
  • Board Model
    SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB left arrow -
  • Board SKU
    11351-14-10 left arrow -
  • Compute Units
    28 CUs (3rd Gen RT + 2nd Gen AI Accelerators) left arrow 16
  • GPU Chip
    AMD Radeon RX 9060 left arrow -
  • Stream Processors
    1792 left arrow -
  • AI Accelerators
    - left arrow 32
  • Execution Units
    - left arrow 16
  • Ray Accelerators
    - left arrow 16
  • Render Output Units
    - left arrow 64
  • Shader
    - left arrow 1024
Memory settings

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

  • Memory Bus
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
  • Memory Data Rate
    18 Gbps Effective left arrow 18 Gbps
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Infinity Cache
    - left arrow 32 MB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    - left arrow 288 GB/s
Clock frequency

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

  • Boost Clock
    Up to 3040 MHz left arrow 2600 MHz
  • Game Clock
    Up to 2440 MHz left arrow 1920 MHz
Thermal Management

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

  • System Power Supply
    450 W (PSU recommendation) left arrow 450 W (System power requirement)
  • Total Board Power
    136W Typical Board Power left arrow -
  • Typical Board Power
    - left arrow 92 W
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Other Display Outputs (unparsed)
    2x HDMI 1x DisplayPort 2.1a left arrow -
  • PCIe Interface
    PCI-Express 5.0 x16 left arrow PCIe 5.0 x16
  • DisplayPort Version
    - left arrow 2.1a
  • HDMI Version
    - left arrow 2.1b
  • Power Connectors
    - left arrow 1x8-Pin
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Form Factor
    2 slot, ATX Dimension: 200(L) X 109.25(W) X 40.6(H)mm left arrow -
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) and SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 9060 OC 8GB.

  • Official source
    https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-9060-8g-gddr6 left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon/9000-series/amd-radeon-rx-9050.html
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons