Select processor 1
Select processor 2
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT

SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
Released
Q1/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT

What's the best choice SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT or PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT has a maximum frequency of 1.925 GHz. Memory size 16 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2022.

PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT has a maximum frequency of 1.900 GHz+ 4 %. Memory size 16 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q1/2021.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    299 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 1% better clock speed

    1.925 GHz left arrow 1.900 GHz+ 4 %

Positions in all rankings

Common positions SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    349 place
  • Battlefield 5
    32 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    194 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    706 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    865 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    914 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    33 place
  • Cyberpunk 2077
    19 place
  • GTA 5 Benchmark (Grand Theft Auto V)
    20 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    390 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    442 place
  • Battlefield 5
    363 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    403 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    316 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    720 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    477 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    366 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    309 place

Specifications

Technical data
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT and PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 21 KXTX (RDNA 2) left arrow Navi 21 XT
  • Execution units
    80 left arrow 72
  • Shader
    5120 left arrow 4608
  • Render Output Units
    128 left arrow 128
  • Texture Units
    320 left arrow 288
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    18 Gbps left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    576 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    256 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT and PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.925 GHz left arrow 1.900 GHz+ 4 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.324 GHz left arrow 2.340 GHz+ 4 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.116 GHz left arrow 2.090 GHz+ 4 %
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    391 W+ 17 % left arrow 300 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 345 W
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 96 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT and PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    3 x 100 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 36-38 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    Addressable LED left arrow Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    320 mm left arrow 320 mm
  • Height
    135 mm left arrow 135 mm
  • Width
    58 mm left arrow 62 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 1610 g
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT and SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q1/2021
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 799 $
  • Structure size
    7 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    11317-02-20G left arrow AXRX 6800XT 16GBD6-3DHE/OC
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT and PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
23.8
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
21.57
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark is designed for gamers, overclockers and system builders who want to get the most out of their hardware
21353
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
17731
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
121 fps (avg)
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
104 fps (avg)
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
83 fps (avg)
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
70 fps (avg)
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash is an algorithm for mining Ethereum cryptocurrency that makes the most of the GPU
56 MH/s
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
64 MH/s
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
The Autolykos algorithm, on which Ergo cryptocurrency is based, allows not only modern GPUs to be used for mining, but also the past generation of GPUs
110 MH/s
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
121 MH/s
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Hashrate mining Ravencoin cryptocurrency on the KawPoW algorithm is fastest on modern video cards
27 MH/s
SAPPHIRE Nitro+ Radeon RX 6950 XT
32 MH/s
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
-->

Latest comparisons