Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB). Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
—
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB

Credit: Official Palit product photograph.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB
Released
—
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

Family illustration.

AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)

What's the best choice Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB or AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)? Which graphics card is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB has a base frequency of 2407 MHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR7.

AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6.

Differences


Positions in all rankings

Common positions Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB)
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB and AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB), chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti left arrow AMD Radeon RX 9050
  • Board Manufacturer
    Palit left arrow -
  • Board Model
    Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB left arrow -
  • Board SKU
    NE7506T019P1-GB2062D left arrow -
  • CUDA Cores
    4608 left arrow -
  • GPU Chip
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti left arrow -
  • AI Accelerators
    - left arrow 32
  • Compute Units
    - left arrow 16
  • Execution Units
    - left arrow 16
  • Ray Accelerators
    - left arrow 16
  • Render Output Units
    - left arrow 64
  • Shader
    - left arrow 1024
Memory settings

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

  • Memory Bandwidth
    448 GB/s left arrow 288 GB/s
  • Memory Bus
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
  • Memory Data Rate
    28 Gbps left arrow 18 Gbps
  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR7 left arrow GDDR6
  • Infinity Cache
    - left arrow 32 MB
Clock frequency

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

  • Boost Clock
    2572 MHz left arrow 2600 MHz
  • Graphics Clock
    2407 MHz left arrow -
  • Game Clock
    - left arrow 1920 MHz
Thermal Management

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

  • System Power Supply
    600 W (PSU recommendation) left arrow 450 W (System power requirement)
  • Total Board Power
    180 W left arrow -
  • Typical Board Power
    - left arrow 92 W
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • DisplayPort Version
    DP2.1b x 3 left arrow 2.1a
  • HDMI Version
    HDMI 2.1b left arrow 2.1b
  • PCIe Interface
    PCI-E 5.0 left arrow PCIe 5.0 x16
  • Power Connectors
    8-pin x 1 left arrow 1x8-Pin
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Dimensions
    262.1 x 126.3 x 40.1 mm left arrow -
  • Slot Size
    2 Slot left arrow -
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU AMD Radeon RX 9050 (8GB) and Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Dual 8GB.

  • Official source
    https://www.palit.com/palit/vgapro.php?id=5545&lang=en&pn=NE7506T019P1-GB2062D&tab=sp left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon/9000-series/amd-radeon-rx-9050.html
  • Verified on
    2026-09-30 left arrow 2026-09-30

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Latest comparisons